Bitcoin News API

[
  {
    "title": "India Bank Shares Jump as Deposit, Yield Worries Ease",
    "description": "Large private banks are trading near their cheapest levels in a decade.",
    "link": "https://www.bloomberg.com/news/newsletters/2026-06-10/india-bank-shares-jump-as-rbi-details-rules-for-foreign-currency-deposits",
    "image_url": null,
    "published_at": "2026-06-10 02:44:44 UTC",
    "sentiment": "bearish",
    "source": "Bloomberg.com",
    "category": "macro"
  },
  {
    "title": "BlackRock Warns Bitcoin And Ethereum Investors About Quantum Computing",
    "description": "BlackRock has entered the quantum-computing debate with a new report warning that future breakthroughs could eventually threaten the cryptography securing Bitcoin, Ethereum and much of the broader digital-asset market. The firm’s central message is not that blockchains face an immediate crisis, but that the industry needs to begin post-quantum migration before “Q-Day” becomes a live security event.\nThe report, titled “Quantum Computing and Blockchains,” was authored by Will Su, Head of Digital Assets Research at BlackRock, Inish Crisson, Senior Software Engineer at Aladdin Digital Assets Lab, and Robert Mitchnick, BlackRock’s Head of Digital Assets. It frames quantum computing as both a cybersecurity risk and a potential test of blockchain governance, particularly for networks that rely on elliptic curve cryptography for transaction signatures.\n“Quantum computing has been the subject of growing attention in recent years, particularly due to its implications for blockchains and many other elements of modern cyber infrastructure,” the authors wrote. “In our view, quantum computing is likely to be a manageable risk for blockchains, subject to the industry’s ability to upgrade swiftly and proactively to post-quantum cryptography in the coming years.”\nBitcoin And Ethereum’s Core Risk\nBlackRock stresses that no functional Cryptographically Relevant Quantum Computer, or CRQC, exists today. But it says timelines have shifted. The report notes that Google has moved its post-quantum migration deadline to 2029, while IBM is targeting large-scale fault-tolerant quantum computing between 2029 and 2033.\nThe main issue is not Bitcoin’s proof-of-work engine. BlackRock says Bitcoin’s SHA-256 hash function is “largely considered quantum-resistant,” with Grover’s algorithm offering only a quadratic speedup that could be absorbed by Bitcoin’s difficulty adjustment. The more relevant attack surface is ownership: the digital signatures that prove control over coins.\n\nBitcoin and Ethereum currently rely on elliptic curve cryptography for key ownership and transaction authorization. Classical computers would need millions to billions of years to break 256-bit ECC, according to the report. A sufficiently powerful quantum computer using Shor’s Algorithm could change that equation by turning private-key recovery into a more tractable mathematical problem.\n“The foundations of modern-day cryptography become challenged in the quantum world,” BlackRock wrote. “This is not because quantum computers run faster. Rather, QCs are particularly efficient at teasing out hidden patterns in large datasets by leveraging unique properties of quantum physics and employing quantum algorithms to solve classically infeasible problems like ECDLPs in as little as days to minutes.”\nBitcoin’s Migration Is Simpler, But Coordination Is Hard\nFor Bitcoin, BlackRock argues that the technical scope of a post-quantum upgrade is narrower than for many other systems because the core task is replacing a digital-signature algorithm. The harder problem is social coordination across a decentralized network that deliberately avoids rapid or centralized change.\nThe report says nearly 7 million BTC, or roughly 35% of circulating supply, may be vulnerable to long-range quantum attacks because public keys have already been exposed. That figure includes 1.9 million BTC in address types that expose unhashed public keys and another 5 million BTC in reused addresses that have revealed public keys in previous transactions while still holding UTXOs.\nBlackRock also highlights the unresolved debate around inactive or lost coins. It cites Chainalysis estimates that 2.3 million to 3.7 million BTC, or 11% to 19% of circulating supply, may be permanently lost. That includes roughly 1.1 million BTC in P2PK addresses widely believed to belong to Satoshi Nakamoto.\n“In our view, PQ migration for cryptocurrencies is eminently addressable from a technical standpoint, and the key challenge is one of timely coordination and implementation,” the report said. “The end-to-end process to build consensus around PQC protocols and timing, implement upgrades on the blockchain, and perform orderly migrations across the ecosystem will likely be a multi-year endeavor.”\nEthereum Has A Roadmap, But More Moving Parts\nEthereum’s situation is different. BlackRock says the network has a more clearly defined migration path, guided by the Ethereum Foundation, but faces greater technical complexity due to its proof-of-stake architecture, smart-contract environment, data layer and application-layer zero-knowledge systems.\n\nThe report cites four Ethereum vulnerability areas identified by Vitalik Buterin in early 2026: BLS signatures in the consensus layer, KZG proofs in the data layer, externally owned account signatures, and zero-knowledge proofs in the application layer. In simpler terms, validator voting, data verification, user transactions and app-level proofs all touch quantum-vulnerable cryptographic assumptions.\nBlackRock points to Ethereum’s “L1 Strawmap,” a draft sequence of seven network updates and hard forks between 2026 and 2029, five of which directly address quantum vulnerabilities. These include native account abstraction, post-quantum signature precompiles, post-quantum validator keys, hash-based consensus signatures and a longer-term shift from KZG commitments toward STARK-based verification.\nA Wall Of Worry For Crypto\nBlackRock’s conclusion is measured. The report does not present quantum computing as an imminent existential threat to Bitcoin or Ethereum. It argues instead that quantum risk is one of the few remaining “walls of worry” for digital assets, and that successful post-quantum migrations could strengthen the sector over time.\n“Global cybersecurity infrastructure stands at an important inflection point as quantum computing advances,” the authors wrote. “Digital assets including Bitcoin and Ethereum are technically positioned for migration; a harder problem is coordinating timelines and rolling out upgrades across decentralized networks in an orderly manner. That said, it is a much less daunting task to upgrade current cryptographic systems, including Bitcoin, Ethereum, and others, to a quantum-secure standard than it is to build a CRQC from where quantum computing progress stands today.”\nAt press time, BTC traded at $62,629.",
    "link": "https://bitcoinist.com/blackrock-warns-bitcoin-ethereum-quantum-computing/",
    "image_url": "https://bitcoinist.com/wp-content/uploads/2026/06/BTCUSDT_2026-06-09_13-43-23.png?resize=1024%2C502",
    "published_at": "2026-06-10 02:30:57 UTC",
    "sentiment": "bullish",
    "source": "bitcoinist.com",
    "category": "bitcoin"
  }
]